“Our argument here is that the uncertainty is so great that we think we should be saying that we don’t actually know for sure.”
In many cases within the meta analysis, previous researchers had stated a number of goals prior to conducting their studies but would then omit negative results and only focus on the goals achieved without mentioning where there were shortcomings, greatly inflating the apparent effectiveness of a given medication.
There were also repeated failures in double-blind tests, generally considered the highest standard of medical research, as both patients and doctors could quickly tell whether a placebo had been administered or not due to the appearance of side effects.
Also on rt.com Should Netflix’s 13 Reasons be held responsible for teen suicide spike or should grown-ups own it? "When you experience side effects, it is easy for the subject as well as for the researchers to guess that you get medication, and then it is not blind," explained lead author Klaus Munkholm.
Load up on vitamin C.We need at least 90 mg of vitamin C per day and the best way to get this is by eating at least five servings of fresh fruit and vegetables every day. So hit the oranges and guavas!
The researchers suggest more in-depth analysis and new and better studies into treatment of depression using so-called active placebos, which mimic side effects to a certain degree to guarantee that studies remain double-blind.
“If we do not and just choose to say that we now believe that the medicine works, then we do not find out how to make better trials and perhaps create better treatment,” Munkholm concludes.
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!
Subscribe to RT newsletter to get stories the mainstream media won’t tell you.